Jump to content
Welcome! ×
Atomic Mass Games Forum

ryfterek

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ryfterek

  1. Hello! I would like to know what happens when the Ewok Traps Tactics card is the last one in a player's Order Deck and they are now to make an activation, specifically: if they draw Ewok Traps as their last card while their Reserve is empty, will they, after resolving the Tactic, shuffle their Order Deck and draw a card out of the refreshed deck? If so, are Ewok Traps shuffled back into their Order Deck before, or after drawing the next card? I.e. can they - with sufficient enough luck - use Ewok Traps twice in one activation? if they decide to draw Ewok Traps as their last card, while there is a card in their Reserve, will they be forced to take a step back to now use their reserved card? Normally deciding to draw a card from the Order Deck forfeits the possibility to use the card in one's Reserve. Cheers!
  2. Hi! Using the "Loadout" Unit keyword, players are instructed they can set-aside one card, meeting a set of criteria (i.e. have equal or lower point cost and the same type), for each upgrade card they have equipped. Let us assume a player equipped "Offensive Push" (6pts training) for which they chose to set aside "Duck and Cover" (2pts training) and "Hunter" (6pts training) for which they chose to set aside "Situational Awareness" (4pts training). Later on, when the Unit deploys, the player may decide to exchange each of their equipped upgrade cards with "the matching set-aside Upgrade Cards one for one". Which Upgrade Cards are the matching ones at this stage? Is it: A) To each upgrade card there's only *one* matching set-aside card, the one chosen during listbuilding. B) To each upgrade card there might be *more* than one matching set-aside card, if more than one set aside card match the initial set of criteria? In our example, if the players decides to substitute "Hunter" for a set-aside card, is their choice only "Situational Awareness" or either "Situational Awareness" or "Duck and Cover "?
  3. Hello! Does the Snip'et informing that "If a character's miniature can't physically fit underneath balance on top of or fit inside a terrain feature, the character cannot end a move there" mean to use the word 'inside' as in physically inside? Or as in 'inside the boundaries of the terrain feature'? By extension, can a miniature end its movement: - in a narrow gap between two buildings, smaller than the width of the base of it? (Almost certainly not, as per not being able to physically fit inside) - on a flat-topped, cubic crate of negligible height that it can balance on top of easily while overhanging over multiple sides? (Possibly not as per fitting inside the imaginary boundaries of the terrain feature) Regards!
  4. Hi! Based on Star Wars: Legion Core Rule Book v2.5, a player may choose to Pass instead of activating a unit if: When Cad Bane's "I Make the Rules Now" Command Card is Divulged, we are instructed not to deploy him, but not what to do with his Order Token. Until a "Here I am" Bane Token is revealed, where does Cad Bane's Order Token exist? Does it count as a remaining token for the purpose of passing the activation?
  5. Hi! Based on Star Wars: Legion Core Rule Book v2.5, the following applies to a vehicle with Hover: X keyword: While the intent appears to be clear, this never explicitly lifts the restriction about gaining and spending Standby tokens that is part of the Repulsor Vehicles rules: Which makes room for an argument that a Repulsor Vehicle with Hover: X may perform the Standby Action not to obtain the token, or if it obtains the token - that it might not be able to spend it. This looks like a clear case of an omission, so my question, for reference, would be - would such an argument be wrong?
  6. Hi! Based on Star Wars: Legion Core Rule Book v1.5, the following governs Ground Vehicles as a source of Cover: Does this mean that: The LOS is blocked completely by Ground Vehicles, such as AT-RT and AT-ST walkers, despite them having indisputable "clear space" between their legs? The LOS through a Ground Vehicles cannot be drawn even when the attacker is in base contact with the Vehicle? If LOS through a Ground Vehicle could be drawn on the pemise of being in base contact with them, is the LOS not blocked at all, from the POV of the unit in base contact with the vehicle, despite any physical features of the Ground Vehicle's mini? If so, can a unit in base contact with a Ground Vehicle make range attacks onto targets that will not be able to respond with a range attack back againts them, because the Ground Vehicle would serve as a "one-way" LOS blocker?
×
×
  • Create New...