Jump to content
Welcome! ×
Atomic Mass Games Forum

脸黑的饿货

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

脸黑的饿货's Achievements

  1. So, if Maul on his last activation Wounds Vader, and is then Wounded by Vader's "The Sith Lord Strikes Back", will he end his last activation immediately and being removed from the game, or before being removed, he may use his "Revenge, I Must Have Revenge" to perform an extra attack?
  2. Well, probably we find out the correct answer ourselves... The Reposition must be added to the resolving queue, however, the effect itself allows the Player choose to Advance or not since there is a "may" in use. In other words, Barriss must resolve the Reposition, but may choose not to Advance, and therefore does not suffer damages from the Strained token - and if she does not Advance, she also may not remove the condition token. I think this is the right way?
  3. If the Defense Expertise Chart grants a chance to Dash while a character is Pinned and in Range 1 of an Ingress Point. Then - a) The character cannot make the move because of the Pinned condition and does not have a chance to use the Ingress Point to shift the Elevation where he is on. b) The character is capable to resolve the effect of Dash but cannot move physically because of the Pinned condition, and from then on he has a chance to use the Ingress Point to shift the Elevation where he is on. We resolved in the way of a), but indeed which one is correct?
  4. It is said that we may place our character within Range 1 of an Ingress Point after shifting the Elevation where the character used to be at. However, since the Ingress Point refers to a Terrain Feature, which is physically an object rather than a single dot, from which point shall we start to measure the Range 1 horizontally? A ladder for example - Is the mid point of its width the only start point allowed for measuring, or is any point at any end of its width allowed?
  5. Here is the scenario - Darth Vader, Jedi Hunter, uses his Vader's Fury to Advance toward Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding, and Engages successfully, adding 2 damages to the Damage Pool of his next attack in this activation. Then, Darth Vader, Jedi Hunter, makes a Combat action with a Melee attack, targeting Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding. Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding, triggers his Mind Tricks and ends the attack. Here comes the question: In this way, will Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding, suffer 2 damages that are granted by Vader's Fury from this attack?
  6. 1) General Anakin Skywalker makes a move action and Engages with Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding; 2) General Anakin Skywalker makes a Combat action with a Melee Attack, targeting Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding; 3) Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding triggers Mind Tricks and ends the attack; 4) 501th Clone Troopers are in range and capable to trigger their Coordinated Fires - however, since the attack was ended by the Mind Tricks and thus there are no rolling Attack Dice step, they fail to trigger their Coordinated Fires; 5) After the Combat action, General Anakin Skywalker Triggers I'm Going to End this and slays down Obi-Wan Kenobi, Out of Hiding. Are these correct or not?
  7. Barriss Offee has a Strained Token on her and defends. Her Defense Dice rolls contain 2 Expertise results which grant her a Reposition. Then, when she needs to resolve the Reposition - a) She may choose not to resolve the effect; b) She must resolve the Reposition but does not move physically - however, since she needs to resolve the effect, she would suffer 3 damages from the Strained token and then remove it. Which one is correct?
  8. If my dice rolls contain 4 Expertise results, could I apply to the row of the effect of 2 results, rather than the row of the effect of 3+ results?
  9. MagnaGuard's Protection Protocols is described as: After an allied Separatist Alliance Primary Unit makes a move action, this Unit may use this ability. Choose a character in the activating Primary Unit. One character in this Unit may Advance Toward the chosen character. The rules of Toward says: The moving object can’t cross a straight line drawn along either arm of the angled movement tool to the edge of the table. Here comes the question: After Count Dooku makes a move action, the MagnaGuard triggers its Protection Protocols, using a bending movement tool to move one of its character Toward Count Dooku. However, since the arc allowed by the rules of Toward is almost occupied by a Terrain part that has a higher Elevation, the bending movement tool used is partially exceed the arc allowed by the rules of Toward. Is this OK? In other words, when judging whether a move Toward something is legal or not, should we only look at the final position of the moving object, or even the movement tool used should not exceed the arc?
  10. I'm confused. It is presented "may X and Y" rather than "may X, then Y", right? So aren't effects X and Y add to the resolving queue at the same time, and according to Appendix A: Timing, in Page 38 of the Core Rules book, which says that "If a player has multiple effects occurring simultaneously, they always choose the order of their own effects." Am I misunderstanding the use of the Appendix wording?
  11. I've read the change of the trigger timing when General Anakin Skywalker should use I'm Going to End This. Does that also mean, now General Anakin Skywalker is allowed to change his Stance rightly before he use I'm Going to End This?
  12. It is said that the Shove effect will cause the affected character may be Pushed away from the shoving character Range 1, then the shoving character may immediately Pull itself toward the affected character Range 1. The effect is described as a 2-stepped game effect and should be resolved step by step, but not mentioned it is necessary to solve the first step in order to gain the effect of the second one. So here is the question: If the Attacker is going to resolve a Shove effect, could it choose not to Push the Defender away, but then Pulls itself towards the Defender?
  13. The Take Cover action allows each Character in the Unit that performs it may be Pushed Range 1 and the Unit gains a Hunker token, which would be lost when Engaged with an enemy. However, a Unit that is Engaged is not forbidden from performing the Take Cover action. So, is it possible for a Unit that is Engaged to perform the Take Cover action, being Pushed away from the enemy it is Engaged (assuming that all Characters in the Unit are capable to achieve so) and becoming no longer Engaged, then gain a Hunker token?
  14. In page 19 of the Core Rules book, it says: At the end of each Turn, the player with the most characters at the same Elevation as an Objective token and contesting that objective controls it. If there is a tie, control of the objective does not change. If there are no characters contesting the objective that are at the same Elevation as the Objective token, the player with the most characters contesting the objective that are at different Elevations than the Objective token controls it. If there is a tie, control of the objective does not change. When a player controls an objective, they place a Control token on it to show it is being controlled, replacing their opponent’s Control token, if one is present. Inactive objectives cannot be contested or controlled. I do understand the examples in the pictures given next to the paragraph, but what about the following case? Ahsoka Tano is contesting an Active Objective with Lord Maul at the same Elevation, while her allied Captain Rex and Maul's allied Mandalorian Super Commandos (2 Characters, who are Ahsoka's enemies) are in Range 2 of the Active Objective but are at a different Elevation of it. Aside, the Active Objective was previously under control of Ahsoka's Player in the last Turn. In this case - 1) Maul's Player win the Active Objective - there is a tie at the same Elevation of the Active Objective, thus characters at different Elevation should be taken into count; 2) It's a tie therefore Ahsoka's Player keeps control of the Active Objective - the rule only says characters at different Elevation could be taken into count when there are no characters contesting the Objective that are at the same Elevation as the Objective token, with no mention saying when there's a tie of the contest at the same Elevation, it should be resolved in the same way. Which is correct?
  15. Here's the Scene: A character who has 1 Injured token performs a Combat action, and gains a free Active Ability (assuming it has not used any of its Active Abilities this Turn) from its Combat Tree. On page 32 of the Core Rules, it says that the character may use one of its Active Abilities which has not been used this Turn without paying its Force cost. However, since the character has 1 Injured token and therefore is Injured, on page 34 of the Core Rules, it says that a Unit that has any number of Injured tokens must spend 1 Force for each of their Injured tokens as an additional cost to use an Active or Reactive ability. In this case, when the character uses the Active Ability offered by its Combat Tree, how mush Force should it pay? 0 or 1?
×
×
  • Create New...