[is choosing a character the same as targeting them?]

understood...

although as a beginner I found the wording on that card a little confusing.

[is choosing a character the same as targeting them?]

one more related question.  so reading this again you are saying it effectively costs 3 energy 2 each from the chosen model and 2 from 2 others within range 3.  the part that misled me was that is says that they May spend 2 energy.  doesn't the use of the word may imply they are not required to spend the 2 energy?  that being the case it should not really use the word "may".   simply removing the word may would make it manditory for each to pay the 2 energy.

 

[is choosing a character the same as targeting them?]

hmm... that makes a huge difference.

[is choosing a character the same as targeting them?]

I ask the above question because it came up in a game.  it is in regards to the Book of Cagliostro TTC.  it says to choose a convocation character.  the real question is can you choose a dazed character?  I understand that if the answer is yes the dazed character can still not play the card.  but can you choose the dazed character then have other characters within range 3 of them play it paying all appropriate costs to remove their activation tokens?

[decoy token conundrum]

that is what we were thinking... thank you

 

[decoy token conundrum]

thinking about it I think we played the crisis wrong... or at least the interact.  when we rolled and no Critical was rolled we removed the decoy, and if you do not that would solve the above issue, because you could simply interact with a different character or on a subsequent Round.

[decoy token conundrum]

I played my first game last night and one of the objectives was the "Skrulls Infiltrate World Leadership" 

the question came up does there have to be a Skrull Agent?  if you roll the 2 dice and the decoy is just a decoy, but all 3 tokens have this result is there just no Skull Agent?