Fred Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 (edited) I'll be a little confuse with patch up : what's the right use of it: Case 1 : I have a charatcter A that is active, He is in 2 of an inactive allied character B. A use patch up, B pay the cost to heal A, is it a legal use? Case 2 : Character A is the active character, he use patch up (assuming A is in 2 of B) and choose charcater B that is a non active allied character, A pay the cost to heal B, is it legal too? Case 3 : A is not in 2 of B, A use patch up, Allied character C that is in 2 of B can pay to heal B or not? Thanks in advance for clarification Edited December 1, 2022 by Fred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoras Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 On 12/1/2022 at 3:59 PM, Fred said: I have a charatcter A that is active, He is in 2 of an inactive allied character B. A use patch up, B pay the cost to heal A, is it a legal use? Whoever is paying the cost is playing the card, so B would be using patchup and paying the cost to remove damage from A. On 12/1/2022 at 3:59 PM, Fred said: Character A is the active character, he use patch up (assuming A is in 2 of B) and choose charcater B that is a non active allied character, A pay the cost to heal B, is it legal too? Yes On 12/1/2022 at 3:59 PM, Fred said: Case 3 : A is not in 2 of B, A use patch up, Allied character C that is in 2 of B can pay to heal B or not? A is irrelevant to this scenario even if A is still the active character. C can use/play the card and pay the cost to heal B even during A's activation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts